Moiré of alongside patterns
edit Geometrical approach
the patterns are superimposed in the mid-width of the figure
Moiré acquired by the superimposition of two agnate patterns rotated by an bend α
Let us accede two patterns fabricated of alongside and centermost lines, e.g., vertical lines. The footfall of the aboriginal arrangement is p, the footfall of the additional is p+δp, with 0<δ<1.
If the curve of the patterns are superimposed at the larboard of the figure, the about-face amid the curve access if traveling to the right. After a accustomed amount of lines, the patterns are opposed: the curve of the additional arrangement are amid the curve of the aboriginal pattern. If we attending from a far distance, we accept the activity of anemic zones if the curve are superimposed, (there is white amid the lines), and of aphotic zones if the curve are "opposed".
The average of the aboriginal aphotic area is if the about-face is according to p/2. The nth band of the additional arrangement is confused by n·δp compared to the nth band of the aboriginal network. The average of the aboriginal aphotic area appropriately corresponds to
n·δp = p/2
that is
n = \frac{p}{2 \delta p}.
The ambit d amid the average of a anemic area and a aphotic area is
d = n \cdot p = \frac{p^2}{2 \delta p}
the ambit amid the average of two aphotic zones, which is aswell the ambit amid two anemic zones, is
2d = \frac{p^2}{\delta p}
From this formula, we can see that :
the bigger the step, the bigger the ambit amid the anemic and aphotic zones;
the bigger the alterity δp, the afterpiece the aphotic and anemic zones; a abundant agreement amid aphotic and anemic zones beggarly that the patterns accept actual abutting steps.
Of course, if δp = p/2, we accept a analogously blah figure, with no contrast.
The assumption of the moiré is agnate to the Vernier scale.
edit Geometrical approach
the patterns are superimposed in the mid-width of the figure
Moiré acquired by the superimposition of two agnate patterns rotated by an bend α
Let us accede two patterns fabricated of alongside and centermost lines, e.g., vertical lines. The footfall of the aboriginal arrangement is p, the footfall of the additional is p+δp, with 0<δ<1.
If the curve of the patterns are superimposed at the larboard of the figure, the about-face amid the curve access if traveling to the right. After a accustomed amount of lines, the patterns are opposed: the curve of the additional arrangement are amid the curve of the aboriginal pattern. If we attending from a far distance, we accept the activity of anemic zones if the curve are superimposed, (there is white amid the lines), and of aphotic zones if the curve are "opposed".
The average of the aboriginal aphotic area is if the about-face is according to p/2. The nth band of the additional arrangement is confused by n·δp compared to the nth band of the aboriginal network. The average of the aboriginal aphotic area appropriately corresponds to
n·δp = p/2
that is
n = \frac{p}{2 \delta p}.
The ambit d amid the average of a anemic area and a aphotic area is
d = n \cdot p = \frac{p^2}{2 \delta p}
the ambit amid the average of two aphotic zones, which is aswell the ambit amid two anemic zones, is
2d = \frac{p^2}{\delta p}
From this formula, we can see that :
the bigger the step, the bigger the ambit amid the anemic and aphotic zones;
the bigger the alterity δp, the afterpiece the aphotic and anemic zones; a abundant agreement amid aphotic and anemic zones beggarly that the patterns accept actual abutting steps.
Of course, if δp = p/2, we accept a analogously blah figure, with no contrast.
The assumption of the moiré is agnate to the Vernier scale.
No comments:
Post a Comment